Sunday, October 19, 2014

Evaluating Learners: Where do they stand



One of the toughest jobs of a teacher is deciding what grade to give a student. Let's say that a student tries extremely hard on a project, but doesn't identify all major points that need covered, should he/she get a failing grade just because not all information was covered. Or lets say you have a student that meets all requirements for a project, but doesn't work well with their team, and only puts in the bare minimum. Just because this student met the requirements, does it mean they deserve an A.

As teachers, we should try to make our lives easier by utilizing the resources given to us. Rubrics especially. Rubrics can be designed around the idea of pushing what you think is truly important, and it gives students a good basis for what to base their assignment around. If you believe teamwork is most important in your parliamentary procedure project, then students can always look back to that Rubric to make sure that they are working as a team, instead of on their own.

While it may seem oversimplified, Rubrics don't have to be complicated, and can be an easy inclusion on any assignment. Simply list out what are the top 4-6 things that are most important about that assignment, and then decide which you believe has more emphasis and deserves to be weighted heavier. If you believe all aspects have equal importance, then break everything down evenly, but you will often find that the item you list first in your mind is usually the one that you would weigh the heaviest.

If your still having trouble with this rubric idea, their are plenty of resources to help you, like online rubric builders. You can do customized ones, or depending on what your teaching, can upload ones created by other teachers. Edudemic has a list of 6 sites that they find helpful in making Online Rubrics.

Rubrics; just one simple tool to help you expand as a teacher.

Sunday, October 12, 2014

Problem based learning vs project based learning

It can be hard too tell the difference between problem based learning and project based learning, heck they even have the same acronym (PBL). The main difference comes down to inquiry.

Inquiry can be a powerful tool in a classroom. It can be used to get students interested in the days lesson, or to teach the students the main concepts and terms of the day's lesson. The difference, in this case, is that while project based learning inquiry is wanted, inquiry is not wanted when it comes to problem based learning.

Problem based learning is using an exact step by step instruction set to solve a problem that students find. For instance, a problem that can arise is wiring a single switch lightbulb. While the order of the steps can be changed slightly, the steps required are always the same. In this way then, inquiry is not recommended because the learning would be focused more on the steps and less on what the actual problem is.

Project based learning is identifying any number of problems that deal with a certain topic, for instance water pollution, and finding a solution. Obviously, their can be no set directions for multiple problems, so inquiry is almost a requirement for a project, so students can figure out their own solutions. Here is a fun video I found on Project Based Learning.

No matter which method you use, students are going to be engaged and motivated to learn.


Sunday, October 5, 2014

Making a difference with differential instruction

This week I had the pleasure of reading about differential instruction. I believe that as a teacher this should be one of our biggest pet peeves. We often hear other teachers (and ourselves) saying that one of our goals is to connect with students and make what we teach "real" to them, yet we all to often find ourselves making/utilizing a one size fits all lesson plan for our students.

As teachers, it might seem daunting to create lesson plans based solely around the idea of building on individual students interests and learning level. But it doesn't mean that students don't learn the same topic, it just means that the students can put their own spin on the lesson.

Interest approach:
This is the easiest place to incorporate differentiated instruction. Students can draw on their own experiences to answer beginning questions and use their prior knowledge to know what needs covered before getting into the lesson.

Content:
This is where things might get challenging. Sometimes to incorporate differential instruction in a lesson plan is hard when your trying to cover a broad topic and try to incorporate individualized instruction as well. But through the use of groups and cooperative learning or a pre-class exercise to see where students interests lie, teachers can incorporate students into the day's topics. Another idea, that the article doesn't discuss is student led conversation/debate/discussion. This gives students the opportunity to speak their mind and draw on their background for class.

Assessment:
This could be as simple as having open-ended questions or could get deeper depending on the situation. I think by giving students required questions and optional questions, you can challenge them as well as build on their expertise. When I call them optional questions I don't mean that their optional for students to answer, but instead they are a list of question options, and students must choose at least one question to answer. While many people say that this isn't the best option because students will choose whichever question is easiest, I would say that i agree. And why are these questions easiest, because that's what they understand best, and it builds upon the students prior knowledge. This helps make the information learned real, but keeps information learned in the lesson fun.

So, remember, if a student has issues with using the information provided, change things up, and give them some differential instruction time, it might just clear things up.

Sunday, September 28, 2014

Just ask the Essentials...

As a future teacher, one of my main concerns is being able to connect with my students, and ask the right questions to not only connect with them but to help them understand what I'm teaching.

I believe that two of the best parts of our reading were from "Effective Questioning Techniques" by James E. Dyer. that dealt with Maximizing Student Participation and with Responses to Student Questions.

Maximizing Student Participation

I really liked this section because it got to the meat of the article "How do I use questions to increase student participation. I thought one good point it made was too include the tip of not reciting student answers. I know I've been in classes where I would specifically wait for the teacher to repeat the answer instead of listen to my fellow classmate, so it made perfect sense to me.

Another interesting tip that the article demonstrated was to not always ask for questions, but to let students ask for themselves. I think recently education majors have been taught to always check for student understanding, and a really common, easy way to do that is to ask if there are any questions. So for Dyer to make the point that this is not the only way to check for student understanding, kind of turns things on it's head. I found this blog on edutopia that gives some examples for how to check for understanding. I think my personal favorite is think-pair-share. I've heard (and even used) this tactic many times before, but, it's still one of those classroom tools that can make the difference in a lesson.
Now that we posed the questions though, it's time for the response.

Responses to Student Questions

Ill be completely honest, one of the hardest things I find for myself is answering student's questions I don't know. As a teacher, I always feel guilty not being able to answer a student's question. But I need to remember that as a person, I don't know all the answers and their are other ways I can handle the question when I'm not sure of the answer.

Honestly these readings have been a huge help, and I have enjoyed the topics so far, and can't wait to read the rest.

Friday, September 26, 2014

RTL Reflection

So, after viewing my video for my RTL reflection, I see some areas for improvement and I see some things that worked for me.

First, what needs improved:

I need to be more confident. I find myself stuttering and adding so many filler words, and I know that if I was more confident in what I was teaching, I wouldn't be as concerned. This also can be related to enthusiasm. I have been lacking on enthusiasm, and I think that connects with my confidence level, I just need to start being more confident in what I'm teaching, and I think the rest will come along.

I also need to work on my interaction level. Whether that's me working with students while their doing projects, or making my actual lesson plans more interactive. I think I am slowly heading in that direction, but it takes time.

What I'm improving on:

Besides making things more interactive, I believe I am getting more comfortable with the students. By that, I mean that I am getting comfortable with the idea that I am no longer a workshop presenter, but am instead a teacher, and that is making me more comfortable with leading a classroom.


While I am still in the learning stages, I see myself improving and will continue to try and improve myself.

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

RTL: First Day of School

As I watched my RTL for this week, I saw some reoccurring moments, but some improvement as well.

First, I think the confidence level was up some, so my filler word count was down. But, even with that said, I still need to try and speak more directly, and that should help take care of my fillers.

Also, I need to work on my interest approaches, and make them more interactive. While I realize that its hard to make expectations, procedures, and consequences fun, we should try and make it as interactive as possible.

While I know that when we are in our classroom it might be different, overall, this was good practice for when we are student teaching.

RTL Reflection for AEE 412 Lab

So, for my first lab, I presented a lesson on card tricks. While the lesson was very simple, it did demonstrate not only some valuable teaching skills, but also communication skills.

Ill be honest. I consider myself to be a pretty decent public speaker. Since FFA, I have tried to work on making myself a better public speaker, but, after I finished my term as Pennsylvania State FFA Treasurer, I found myself speaking publicly less and less, and speaking with fewer public officials. Even still, I thought I had retained most of these skills throughout my college career. But after watching this video, I realized that my public speaking skills need worked on. I found myself saying the word "like" alot.

I also noticed that I need to work on my confidence level as well. I believe that relates to my speaking ability, if I practiced more I believe I would be more confident and would say less fillers.

Sunday, September 21, 2014

Experiential Learning in the Field: Utilizing a Field Trip

How often do you hear students saying that the best part of a field trip is getting out of school. What always makes me laugh is that, while yes, the students are getting out of the school building, they are not leaving the actual institution of school. Field trips should not be about getting out of school, field trips should be integral. A part of school, that students expect to happen, not a welcome surprise to get out of a classroom.

Most people, when they think of the term field trip, they immediately think of the students leaving school property and going far away to a place that the students are unfamiliar with. But why, why can't a field trip be the simple idea of just getting out of the classroom. Maybe you take your environmental students out to the wooded area behind the school. Maybe their is a stream within walking distance that you can take students to, to perform a stream study. Maybe you bring livestock onto school grounds for your animal science class. Just because your not going very far, it doesn't mean it isn't a field trip for your students.

That of course doesn't mean that you can't take students on those far away trips. Sometimes, these can be some of the most valuable learning lessons, as they are a truly hands-on experience for the students, so they can see why this education is important, and where they can use it in the real-world.

Often the problem is that our students aren't excited for the learning opportunity, but for the chance to leave the classroom setting for a day. What should be expected is that students are excited for the learning opportunity as much as, if not more than, the opportunity to leave behind the desk. So how do we accomplish this;

1. Make the field trip student centered.
Just like in the classroom, education should be student-centered. Whether that's making a post-field trip survey for your students or letting them have a say in where field trips are, student's must have some kind of investment in their education.

2. Take into account the Prior, During, and Post steps of a field trip.
Make sure that students have enough background information, and are assessed adequately so that when the field trip takes place, the students can be excited for whats happening, and less excited about what their getting out of.

I believe that if these two aspects are considered, students will get more of a complete experience out of field trips.

Sunday, September 14, 2014

Hook, Line, Sinker: Student engagement is the catch of the day!!

Do me a favor? Think about your favorite class in highschool/college. What made that class fun/exciting/useful for you. My favorite class was wildlife and fisheries, and my favorite unit in that class was on Survival Skills in the field. For two weeks, not a single day was spent inside a classroom; we were outside, exploring, testing different survival techniques and skills. We had a blast learning important skills that I still remember to this day. What really got all of us hooked was the simple interest approach that Mrs. Mosemann presented at the beginning of class: You and two teammates are stranded on an island. You can have two materials from the list. What do you choose, Why, and how do you survive. To be completely honest, none of us were even close to survivalist experts, and unless I see one of my former classmates on the discovery channel, I find it safe to assume that we still are not masters of the wilderness. But, through a simple interest approach, Instantly I became excited and interested in one of the greatest weeks of learning that I have ever had.

Any day of any given week, you could take a walk down a high school hallway and find students in classrooms, doing what high-schoolers seem to do best..... Sleeping. Most would assume that the content was dry, and while in some cases that may be correct, in others, we find that a teacher has either:

A. Not provided an interest approach, Or

B. The interest approach is a powerpoint slide that introduces a lecture.

If you are a teacher guilty of this, let me proceed to give you the proverbial pat on the shoulder and tell you, everything will be alright, we caught it in time. Now is the time to start taking action in your interest approaches, and start changing your ways. You ask yourself (and me probably, since I'm posing the question), "How do I engage my student's more?". Well, it starts with student engagement.

 Interest approaches can be approached (see what I did their) in multiple ways. But it all comes back to three basic structures: Are students intrigued, Are students lacking insight/knowledge, Do students see the need? these three areas can make/break any lesson plan. Lets take a closer look.

Are my students intrigued/engaged?
For an interest approach to work, it needs to make students excited. For instance, too change things up, use playdough, or markers and personal whiteboards as part of an interest approach sometime. You will discover one of the greatest lessons ever: No matter how old someone gets, they will always love playdough/drawing. Maybe arts isn't your style. That's fine; get the brain juices flowing by actually giving the students a challenge. People naturally become more attentive when there schema's are contorted and twisted and sent into a new direction. A student thinks that they are the master of plant science, give them a new challenge, give them a different perspective and then BAM!!!! this student goes from being Mr./Mrs. master of the universe, to Mr./Mrs. im going to be master of the universe. Which leads into my next point;

Are my students challenged?
This fits into the structure of student insight/knowledge. This section can be more of a balancing act. While students are more likely to be engaged when they are challenged by a subject, they will immediately shut down when you ask them to perform calculus when they are on a basic geometry basis. OK, maybe that is a little extreme, but the point is, students need to have the background knowledge capable to answer at least part of the interest approach. You wouldn't want to have an interest approach of  students performing surgery on an animal if they don't know the parts of that particular animal. Furthermore, you don't want students to diagram mitosis if you gave them the diagram the day before in class. Once a student is challenged, the last part should fall into place.

Do my students see the need?
If a student is excited and challenged, the need should become more intrinsic (I need to know this because if I want to be master of my own domain, I should know this information.). But, as teachers we should be able to make this a deeper more meaningful experience. Why should I as a student know average corn yields in my county and state and how to increase those yields? Well, since daddy grows corn, and granddaddy grew corn, and great-granddaddy grew corn, and I want to grow corn so I can feed my cows, this kind of information is important. Lets say you don't come from an Ag background, how does corn yield effect you? well, corn effects ethanol, when ethanol prices are sky high, fuel prices become sky high. corn prices also effect beef/sheep/swine/ and just about any other livestock price. If I know what it takes to produce high yields of corn, and I know that the corn isn't receiving it (water for instance). Can't I make an educated guess that low corn yields lead to high corn prices (Look at that, I just incorporated economics), which will lead to high meat prices and high fuel prices, and isn't their an old saying that goes "an informed shopper is a wise shopper". This is a needs based approach, and maybe you can think of a different way to fill the need. Either way, if students don't see the need, students wont care about what you teaching, and that's when you see sleeping teenagers in your classroom.

Congratulations, you have reached the conclusion of this blog. But seriously, engaging students is an important need that should be at the top of any teachers to do list. It is our job to make sure we cover the three basic structures and that we challenge our students to be involved in their education. Maybe a good way to get them involved is a Survivalist Unit Plan?

Sunday, September 7, 2014

Learning a Lesson through Lesson Plans

Ahhhhh, the sweet smell of new curriculum. Ill be completely honest, when I first dove into our reading assignments for this week, I was overwhelmed by the amount of curriculum talked about. But, as I started going through the paperwork, some common themes began to stick out to me.

EMPHASIS ON STANDARDS
Whether it is the actual government based curriculum standards, or the act of us as Agricultural Educators holding ourselves to our own standards, we must always have an accountability system to judge ourselves against. I believe as Ag teachers, while we might never be able to make a national standard, I believe locally working with other teachers, and working with other teachers in your school, one can develop a local standard that will prepare your students with the knowledge to help their community and surrounding area.

EMBRACE STUDENT DIVERSITY
Both the Ag Ed Magazine, and the PA Academic Standards address the need to embrace student diversity and to make sure that all students needs are being filled. With Agriculture becoming an increasingly international affair, and all cultures working together to fix hunger, its important to remember all perspectives when teaching students, that way they learn to have an open mindset.

STUDENT EDUCATION COMES FIRST
While this one seems obvious, but sometimes when developing curriculum, we get so caught up in what we want to teach, and what we want our students to learn, we forget that our students can and should have a say in what they learn, and we should try to incorporate their interests into what we learn. The more a student feels that they are in control of what they learn, and they influence their education the more they will care. The University of New South Wales in Australia highlights that aspect in their Guidelines for Learning.

I believe that these three themes are important not only for proper curriculum, but for student achievement as well.

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Developing Your Membership: Then and Now

One of the most vital parts of the FFA is the membership. As future agricultural educators, It is important to look at where our membership has come since those early days in 1928, and how we look at our membership now. When you look at FFA, its membership/members have changed just like the organization as a whole. For Instance

Compared back to the early days, FFA doesn't have a focus on just farming anymore. FFA contains production, research, science, math, and just about everything you can think of. Looking through the Ag Ed Magazine, we can see that teachers have changed that viewpoint as well. In 1944 (Volume 17), one of the main sections of the Ag Ed Magazine was the Farming Mechanics Section, and the Farming Methods section. Since then, the magazine moved its focus from farming to the science and leadership aspects of teaching(Volume 80) (Volume 64, Labratory Teaching).

Another change is the influence of Urban Agriculture. In the 40's, 50's, and even into the 60's, urban agriculture was not considered, as in many cases it didn't exist. Beginning in the 60's though, FFA began to change, and the typical rural farm scene didn't apply to all students (Volume39, Changes in FFA).

Now, Urban Agriculture and International Agriculture are some of the front runners, and of great importance to the modern FFA. (Volume 80, Cultivating Diversity)


Even though the FFA has changed over time, some ideals last forever.

Members always come first. Even in the early days of FFA and Ag Ed, members were responsible for running the FFA Chapter and it's events. (Volume 17, Interest in the FFA Chapter) and even now, a main focus on the FFA Chapter is the leadership of its members.

The FFA overall, no matter how much it changes, is still our fundamental organization attached to agricultural education, and will always be that way.


(I do not own any of the photos in this blog)

Articles found in Ag Ed magazine
Foster, B. (2008, January ). Ag ed magazine, volume 80,. Retrieved from http://www.naae.org/links/agedmagazine/archive/Volume80/v80i4.pdf

Johnson, D. (1991, September). Ag ed magazine, volume 64, effective labratory teaching. Retrieved from http://www.naae.org/links/agedmagazine/archive/Volume64/Vol 64 No 3.PDF

Miller, L. (1983, October). Ag ed magazine, volume 56. Retrieved from http://www.naae.org/links/agedmagazine/archive/Volume56/v56i4.pdf

Householder, L. (1978, October). Ag ed magazine, volume 51, local supervision in ag ed. Retrieved from http://www.naae.org/links/agedmagazine/archive/Volume51/v51i4.pdf

Wolff, F. (1967, May). Ag ed magazine, volume 39, changes in the ffa. Retrieved from http://www.naae.org/links/agedmagazine/archive/Volume39/v39i11.pdf

Fausold, G. (1954, December). Ag ed magazine, volume 27, there are limits to ffa programs. Retrieved from http://www.naae.org/links/agedmagazine/archive/Volume27/v27i6.pdf

Watson, C. D. (1944, September). Ag ed magazine, volume 17, interest in the ffa chapter. Retrieved from http://www.naae.org/links/agedmagazine/archive/Volume17/v17i3.pdf